Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Viking Fourtech Budget-Reifen

4. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Budget-Reifen

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

3. Viking Fourtech 32

4. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 1

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Viking Fourtech 5x

4. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 3x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 5.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

4. Viking Fourtech 11.

1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 9.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

4. Viking Fourtech 25.

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 7.33

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

4. Viking Fourtech 17

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 2024

4. Viking Fourtech 2021

1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Beispielhaft

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Gut

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive

75%

Viking
Fourtech

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. Viking Fourtech 77%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 68%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

3. Viking Fourtech 71%

4. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 85%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. Viking Fourtech 55%

1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 80%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Viking Fourtech 59%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. GT RADIAL ClimateActive ?

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive

73%

Viking
Fourtech

68%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

?

BFGoodrich
Advantage

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Viking
Fourtech

79%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive

63%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. Viking Fourtech 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

4. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 56%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 80%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Viking Fourtech 65%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 53%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. GT RADIAL ClimateActive ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive

77%

Viking
Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

4. Viking Fourtech 66%

1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 78%

2. Viking Fourtech 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive ?

2. Viking Fourtech ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Viking
Fourtech

59%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 71%

4. Viking Fourtech 47%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive 74%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%