Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Viking Fourtech Budget-Reifen

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Viking Fourtech 32

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Viking Fourtech 5x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

4. Viking Fourtech 11.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

4. Viking Fourtech 25.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

4. Viking Fourtech 17

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Viking Fourtech 2021

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Viking
Fourtech

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. Viking Fourtech 55%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Viking Fourtech 59%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Viking Fourtech 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Viking Fourtech ?

Viking
Fourtech

68%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

?

BFGoodrich
Advantage

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Viking
Fourtech

79%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Viking Fourtech 65%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

3. Viking Fourtech 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Viking Fourtech ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Viking
Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

70%

1. Viking Fourtech 76%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

4. Viking Fourtech 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Viking
Fourtech

59%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Viking Fourtech 47%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%