Vergleich: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Obere-Mittelklasse

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 22

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 4x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Falken e.Ziex 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 7.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 11.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 9

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 2020

1. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Bedingt empfohlen

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

Toyo
Proxes CF2 SUV

58%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 65%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 47%

1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 77%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 56%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 40%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

Toyo
Proxes CF2 SUV

73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 81%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 76%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 67%

Toyo
Proxes CF2 SUV

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 98%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

Toyo
Proxes CF2 SUV

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV ?