Vergleich: Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Budget-Reifen

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Michelin e.Primacy 12

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

1. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zufriedenstellend

3. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Michelin
e.Primacy

59%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

57%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

46%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 1%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. Michelin e.Primacy B

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin
e.Primacy

71%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

57%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

49%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 63%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 63%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

42%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

2. Michelin e.Primacy ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Michelin
e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

87.5%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 65%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?