Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Nokian WetProof Obere-Mittelklasse

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Nokian WetProof 47

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Nokian WetProof 14x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Nokian WetProof 17.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Nokian WetProof 5.64

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Nokian WetProof Sehr empfohlen

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

1. Nokian WetProof Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Nokian
WetProof

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Nokian WetProof 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 86%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 91%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Nokian WetProof 89%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Hankook ION Evo A

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Nokian
WetProof

76%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Nokian WetProof 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 80%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Nokian WetProof 71%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Nokian
WetProof

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Nokian WetProof 69%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 87%

3. Hankook ION Evo 78%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Hankook ION Evo ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

Nokian
WetProof

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

2. Hankook ION Evo 69%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

4. Nokian WetProof 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Nokian WetProof 56%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

2. Hankook ION Evo 60%

3. Nokian WetProof 46%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Nokian WetProof C