Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. Michelin e.Primacy 111

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 91

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

5. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

3. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

5. Nokian Powerproof 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

5. Nokian Powerproof 2 6.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 10.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

5. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 8

5. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

3. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

4. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

5. Nokian Powerproof 2 Empfohlen

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Empfohlen

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

5. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

72%

Falken
e.Ziex

71%

Michelin
e.Primacy

61%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

5. Nokian Powerproof 2 42%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 74%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 84%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

4. Michelin e.Primacy B

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

85%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

81%

Michelin
e.Primacy

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

61%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 69%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

5. Nokian Powerproof 2 71%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 93%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

3. Falken e.Ziex 87%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 74%

5. Nokian Powerproof 2 42%

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

84%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

Michelin
e.Primacy

67%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 84%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 B

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

5. Nokian Powerproof 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. Michelin e.Primacy ?

5. Nokian Powerproof 2 ?