Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Nokian Line Obere-Mittelklasse

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Nokian Line 53

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Nokian Line 6x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

2. Nokian Line 6.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Nokian Line 17.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Nokian Line 12.17

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Nokian Line 2018

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

3. Nokian Line Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Nokian Line Gut

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Nokian
Line

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. Nokian Line 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Nokian Line 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Nokian Line 84%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Nokian Line 87%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Nokian Line 84%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

1. Nokian Line A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

Nokian
Line

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Nokian Line 83%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Nokian Line 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Nokian Line 74%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

1. Nokian Line 85%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Nokian
Line

62%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

3. Nokian Line 63%

1. Nokian Line 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 93%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Nokian Line 78%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Nokian Line C

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

74%

Nokian
Line

66%

1. Nokian Line 72%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Nokian Line 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

3. Nokian Line 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Nokian Line ?

3. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB