Vergleich: Michelin Agilis+ gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. Michelin Agilis+ Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Michelin Agilis+ 32

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Michelin Agilis+ 1x

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

3. Michelin Agilis+ 10.

1. Michelin Agilis+ 10.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Michelin Agilis+ 10

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

3. Michelin Agilis+ 2019

1. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Michelin Agilis+ ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

3. Michelin Agilis+ ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

Michelin
Agilis+

64%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

3. Michelin Agilis+ 33%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. Michelin Agilis+ 67%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. Michelin Agilis+ 66%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. Michelin Agilis+ 67%

1. Michelin Agilis+ 89%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Michelin Agilis+ B

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

76%

Michelin
Agilis+

67%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. Michelin Agilis+ 61%

1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87.2%

Michelin
Agilis+

70%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

68%

Michelin
Agilis+

91%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

1. Michelin Agilis+ 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

1. Michelin Agilis+ C

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C