Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Hankook ION Evo Premium

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Michelin e.Primacy 111

3. Hankook ION Evo 64

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

5. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

5. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

5. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

5. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

3. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

4. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

4. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Michelin
e.Primacy

62%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Michelin e.Primacy B

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Michelin
e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

70%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 76%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

Michelin
e.Primacy

65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. Hankook ION Evo 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 54%

1. Hankook ION Evo ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

5. Michelin e.Primacy ?

Michelin
e.Primacy

89%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Hankook
ION Evo

76%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Hankook ION Evo 69%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Hankook ION Evo 82%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Hankook ION Evo A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?