Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Firestone Roadhawk Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

1. Firestone Roadhawk Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Firestone Roadhawk Bedingt empfohlen

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

62%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Firestone
Roadhawk

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

1. Firestone Roadhawk ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk

72%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 93%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Firestone Roadhawk C

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C