Vergleich: General Tire Grabber GT Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Budget-Reifen

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Zufriedenstellend

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Zufriedenstellend

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

0%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

0%

Falken
e.Ziex

0%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

80%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 60%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 60%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

Michelin
Primacy 4+

85%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?