Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Hankook ION Evo Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Hankook ION Evo 64

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

5. Firestone Multihawk 0

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

5. Firestone Multihawk 0x

1. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Hankook ION Evo 1.

5. Firestone Multihawk 0.

1. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Hankook ION Evo 1.

5. Firestone Multihawk 0.

1. Michelin e.Primacy 12

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Hankook ION Evo 1

5. Firestone Multihawk 0

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Firestone Multihawk 2014

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk ?

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

5. Firestone Multihawk ?