Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 Budget-Reifen

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Falken e.Ziex 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

5. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

4. Michelin e.Primacy 12

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zufriedenstellend

5. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Michelin
e.Primacy

59%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

56%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Michelin e.Primacy B

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

3. Michelin e.Primacy ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Michelin
e.Primacy

74.4%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

48%

Michelin
e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 65%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

5. Falken e.Ziex ?