Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

5. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

5. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

5. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

Continental
PremiumContact 7

85%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Michelin
e.Primacy

59%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

5. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Michelin e.Primacy B

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Michelin e.Primacy ?

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

100%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Michelin
e.Primacy

74.4%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin
e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

81%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?