Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 121

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 12x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 18.

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 2023

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Sehr empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Bedingt empfohlen

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

64%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 70%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 69%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 63%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 64%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 56%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

75%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

74%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

5. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

71%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

68%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4

77%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ?

5. Falken e.Ziex ?