Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

81%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. BFGoodrich Advantage A

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

BFGoodrich
Advantage

75%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

64%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

5. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87.2%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

68%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

66%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

74%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

4. BFGoodrich Advantage C

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 E