Vergleich: Cooper CS7 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Cooper CS7 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Firestone Roadhawk Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Cooper CS7 71

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

5. Cooper CS7 1x

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

5. Cooper CS7 15.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Cooper CS7 15.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

5. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

5. Cooper CS7 15

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

5. Cooper CS7 2022

1. Firestone Roadhawk Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

5. Cooper CS7 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Cooper CS7 Zufriedenstellend

4. Firestone Roadhawk Bedingt empfohlen

5. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Falken
e.Ziex

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk

73%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

Cooper
CS7

60%

1. Cooper CS7 78%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

5. Cooper CS7 36%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

2. Cooper CS7 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

5. Cooper CS7 58%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Firestone Roadhawk A

4. Cooper CS7 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

88%

Firestone
Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

71%

Cooper
CS7

58%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Cooper CS7 48%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

3. Cooper CS7 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Cooper
CS7

75%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

1. Cooper CS7 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Cooper CS7 72%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Cooper CS7 70 dB

2. Firestone Roadhawk ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

5. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB