Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Premium

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 58

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 5x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 4.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2.2

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Beispielhaft

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

1. Falken e.Ziex Gut

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 86%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 85%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 79%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV A

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 76%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

89%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 90%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 83%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

71%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 73%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 96%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 87%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?