Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

62%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 55%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 64%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 0%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 74%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

86%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 85%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

75%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. BFGoodrich Advantage C