Vergleich: Yokohama BluEarth-XT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 0

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 7.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 7.

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 7

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Zufriedenstellend

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Zufriedenstellend

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT

61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 51%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 62%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 38%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 77%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

2. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 75%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

75%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT

52%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 60%

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 60%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 51%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 51%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 45%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT ?

Michelin
Primacy 4+

85%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT

66%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 67%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 64%

Yokohama
BluEarth-XT

82%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

80%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

68%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 69%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 60%

1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT 95%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?