Vergleich: Viking WinTech gegen GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

2. Viking WinTech Budget-Reifen

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Budget-Reifen

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Viking WinTech 53

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 32

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. Viking WinTech 6x

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 3x

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 3.

3. Viking WinTech 11.

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 17.

3. Viking WinTech 41.

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 9.67

3. Viking WinTech 20.83

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 2024

3. Viking WinTech 2024

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testsieger

2. Viking WinTech Empfohlen

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Empfohlen

2. Viking WinTech Bedingt empfohlen

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Ausreichend

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

GT
Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

57%

Viking
WinTech

56%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 70%

3. Viking WinTech 61%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

2. Viking WinTech 62%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 59%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 56%

3. Viking WinTech 46%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Viking WinTech 52%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 48%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 54%

3. Viking WinTech 52%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Viking WinTech 60%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 0%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Viking WinTech ?

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo ?

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

GT
Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

71%

Viking
WinTech

67%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 72%

3. Viking WinTech 71%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

2. Viking WinTech 73%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 72%

1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 69%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

3. Viking WinTech 47%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 73%

3. Viking WinTech 65%

1. Viking WinTech 77%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 0%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Viking
WinTech

72%

GT
Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

53%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 63%

3. Viking WinTech 62%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

2. Viking WinTech 59%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 44%

1. Viking WinTech 79%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 0%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Viking
WinTech

65%

GT
Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

62%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 67%

3. Viking WinTech 61%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Viking WinTech 71%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 0%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 81%

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 57%

3. Viking WinTech 50%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo ?

3. Viking WinTech ?

Viking
WinTech

75%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

GT
Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

45%

1. Viking WinTech 67%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo 45%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

2. Viking WinTech ?

3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo ?

Viking
WinTech

84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

GT
Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

0%