Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Viking Fourtech Budget-Reifen

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Viking Fourtech 32

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Viking Fourtech 5x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Viking Fourtech 11.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Viking Fourtech 25.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Viking Fourtech 17

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Viking Fourtech 2021

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

Continental
PremiumContact 7

85%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Viking
Fourtech

72%

1. Viking Fourtech 77%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

4. Viking Fourtech 55%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Viking Fourtech 59%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

4. Viking Fourtech ?

Viking
Fourtech

68%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Viking
Fourtech

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

3. Viking Fourtech 77%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 77%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Viking Fourtech 65%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Viking Fourtech ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Viking
Fourtech

71%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

69%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. Viking Fourtech 66%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

1. Viking Fourtech 76%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

1. Viking Fourtech ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

88%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Viking
Fourtech

59%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Viking Fourtech 47%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%