Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium

3. Hankook ION FlexClimate Premium

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Viking Fourtech Budget-Reifen

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 151

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. Viking Fourtech 32

5. Hankook ION FlexClimate 27

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 24x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Viking Fourtech 5x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

5. Hankook ION FlexClimate 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Hankook ION FlexClimate 1.

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 1.

4. Falken e.Ziex 2.

5. Viking Fourtech 11.

1. Hankook ION FlexClimate 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 9.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

5. Viking Fourtech 25.

1. Hankook ION FlexClimate 1

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 2.71

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

5. Viking Fourtech 17

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Hankook ION FlexClimate 2025

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

5. Viking Fourtech 2021

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Hankook ION FlexClimate Sehr gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Testsieger

5. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

5. Hankook ION FlexClimate ?

Hankook
ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

76%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Viking
Fourtech

72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 77%

4. Viking Fourtech 55%

5. Hankook ION FlexClimate 0%

1. Hankook ION FlexClimate 84%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. Viking Fourtech 59%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Hankook ION FlexClimate 90%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 75%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION FlexClimate 95%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 79%

3. Viking Fourtech 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

5. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Hankook ION FlexClimate 90%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 75%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

5. Viking Fourtech 71%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. Hankook ION FlexClimate B

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 B

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

5. Viking Fourtech ?

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook
ION FlexClimate

75%

Viking
Fourtech

68%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

?

Falken
e.Ziex

?

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 90%

2. Viking Fourtech 82%

3. Hankook ION FlexClimate 78%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 93%

2. Viking Fourtech 67%

3. Hankook ION FlexClimate 0%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 92%

2. Viking Fourtech 71%

3. Hankook ION FlexClimate 71%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 92%

2. Hankook ION FlexClimate 76%

3. Viking Fourtech 51%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Hankook
ION FlexClimate

84%

Viking
Fourtech

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

68%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 74%

3. Viking Fourtech 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. Hankook ION FlexClimate 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. Viking Fourtech 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Michelin CrossClimate 2 43%

5. Hankook ION FlexClimate 0%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Falken e.Ziex 95%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 87%

4. Hankook ION FlexClimate 84%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 C

3. Hankook ION FlexClimate C

4. Viking Fourtech ?

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Viking
Fourtech

59%

1. Hankook ION FlexClimate 90%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 82%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

5. Viking Fourtech 71%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 92%

2. Hankook ION FlexClimate 90%

3. Falken e.Ziex 88%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

5. Viking Fourtech 47%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook
ION FlexClimate

81%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Viking
Fourtech

71%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 84%

2. Hankook ION FlexClimate 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. Viking Fourtech 76%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 83%

3. Viking Fourtech 66%

4. Hankook ION FlexClimate 0%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 ?

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. Hankook ION FlexClimate ?

5. Falken e.Ziex ?