Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Viking Fourtech Budget-Reifen

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 188

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. Viking Fourtech 32

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 23x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Viking Fourtech 5x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Viking Fourtech 11.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 6.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Viking Fourtech 25.

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 3.26

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Viking Fourtech 17

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Viking Fourtech 2021

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Sehr gut

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport

85%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Viking
Fourtech

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 86%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Viking Fourtech 55%

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 93%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Viking Fourtech 59%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 75%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 79%

2. Viking Fourtech 77%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Viking
Fourtech

68%

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

?

Falken
e.Ziex

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Viking
Fourtech

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport

69%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Falken e.Ziex 95%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 58%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 85%

3. Viking Fourtech 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. Viking Fourtech 77%

3. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport C

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport

86%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Viking
Fourtech

59%

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 85%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%

1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 88%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Viking Fourtech 47%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport

74%

Viking
Fourtech

71%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Viking Fourtech 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport 79%

3. Viking Fourtech 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport ?

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?