Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Viking Fourtech Budget-Reifen

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. Viking Fourtech 32

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Viking Fourtech 5x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Viking Fourtech 11.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Viking Fourtech 25.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Viking Fourtech 17

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Viking Fourtech 2021

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

1. Falken e.Ziex Gut

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Viking
Fourtech

72%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

46%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

3. Viking Fourtech 71%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Viking Fourtech 55%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 1%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. Viking Fourtech 59%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Viking Fourtech 77%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Viking
Fourtech

68%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

?

Continental
UltraContact NXT

?

Falken
e.Ziex

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

88%

Viking
Fourtech

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Falken e.Ziex 95%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 88%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Viking Fourtech 65%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Viking
Fourtech

71%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

42%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Viking Fourtech 66%

3. Falken e.Ziex 0%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Viking Fourtech 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Viking Fourtech ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Viking
Fourtech

59%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

57%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 63%

4. Viking Fourtech 47%

1. Falken e.Ziex 81%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Viking Fourtech 71%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%