Vergleich: Nokian WR SUV 4 gegen Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Obere-Mittelklasse

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 78

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 69

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 13x

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 5x

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. Nokian WR SUV 4 1.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 7.

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 8.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 20.

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. Nokian WR SUV 4 4.6

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 11.92

1. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 2021

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testsieger

2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Testsieger

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Empfohlen

2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Gut

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Ausreichend

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

70%

Nokian
WR SUV 4

67%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Nokian WR SUV 4 77%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 75%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 67%

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 60%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 73%

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 68%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 79%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 58%

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 36%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro B

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 C

Nokian
WR SUV 4

79%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

60%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 82%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 27%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 83%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 66%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 67%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 80%

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 67%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

2. Nokian WR SUV 4 71%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 62%

Nokian
WR SUV 4

89%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 84%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 77%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 85%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 79%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 100%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 71%

Nokian
WR SUV 4

93%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

0%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Nokian
WR SUV 4

69%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 76%

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 72%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 71%

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 65%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro ?

3. Nokian WR SUV 4 ?

Nokian
WR SUV 4

81%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro

60%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 81%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro 60%

1. Nokian WR SUV 4 C

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro D