Vergleich: Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Premium

2. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Falken e.Ziex 34

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 0

1. Falken e.Ziex 3x

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 2x

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 3.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 7.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 5

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 2019

1. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Zufriedenstellend

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?