Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Hankook ION Evo 64

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 55

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Falken e.Ziex 3x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

3. Hankook ION Evo 1x

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 6.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 6.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 6

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 2025

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Gut

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 76%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 76%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 84%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 75%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 71%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

0%

Falken
e.Ziex

0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

63%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 67%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Hankook ION Evo ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 84%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

69%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71 SUV

60%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?