Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Hankook ION Evo 64

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 4.8

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2026

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Sehr empfohlen

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Hankook ION Evo 87%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Hankook ION Evo 66%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. Hankook ION Evo 0%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Hankook ION Evo ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

72%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

3. Hankook ION Evo 60%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Hankook ION Evo B

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C