Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. Hankook ION Evo Premium

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Hankook ION Evo 64

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

Michelin
Primacy 4+

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Hankook ION Evo 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

75%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91%

3. Hankook ION Evo 82%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Hankook ION Evo A

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

85%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%