Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Hankook ION Evo ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Hankook ION Evo A

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 88%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%