Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 225

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 12x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 16.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 6.25

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Gut

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

63%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 74%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 51%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

68%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

75%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 78%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%