Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken e.Ziex 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Beispielhaft

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Gut

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

80%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 78%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

4. Falken e.Ziex 77%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 83%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

71%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 93%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 53%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

87%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%