Segment 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium 2. Hankook ION Evo Premium 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?
Anzahl der verfügbaren Größen 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 123 3. Hankook ION Evo 64 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23
Anzahl der Tests 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x 3. Hankook ION Evo 1x 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?
Beste Position im Test 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2. 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1. 3. Hankook ION Evo 1. 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?
Schlechteste Position im Test 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8. 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5. 3. Hankook ION Evo 1. 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?
Durchschnittliche Position in Tests 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5 3. Hankook ION Evo 1 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?
Jahr der letzten Prüfung 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025 2. Hankook ION Evo 2025 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 2018
Beste Bewertung im Test 1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?
Schlechteste Bewertung im Test 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut 3. Hankook ION Evo ? 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?
Nass(Gesamtbewertung) Hankook ION Evo 89% GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 80% Michelin Primacy 4+ 77% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%
Handling - nass 1. Hankook ION Evo 92% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%
Aquaplaning - quer 1. Hankook ION Evo 87% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 71% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%
Aquaplaning - längs 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 87% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79% 3. Hankook ION Evo 77% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%
Nassbremsen 1. Hankook ION Evo 97% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78% 4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%
Kreisbahn nass 1. Hankook ION Evo 92% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%
Nassbremsung nach EU-Label 1. Hankook ION Evo A 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ A 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV B
Trocken(Gesamtbewertung) Hankook ION Evo 92% GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89% Michelin Primacy 4+ 73% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%
Handling - trocken 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 93% 2. Hankook ION Evo 92% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%
Trockenbremsen 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 92% 2. Hankook ION Evo 91% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%
Kosten(Gesamtbewertung) GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88% Michelin Primacy 4+ 87% GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 78% Hankook ION Evo 76%
Rollwiderstand 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 88% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72% 4. Hankook ION Evo 69%
Kilometerstand 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91% 3. Hankook ION Evo 82% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%
Kraftstoffverbrauch nach eu-label 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B 2. Hankook ION Evo B 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ C 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV C
Komfort(Gesamtbewertung) Michelin Primacy 4+ 81% GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 78% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 70% Hankook ION Evo 66%
Außengeräusch 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67% 4. Hankook ION Evo 66%
Innengeräusche 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 85% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73% 4. Hankook ION Evo 0%
Außenlärm nach EU-Label 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ? 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ ? 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ? 4. Hankook ION Evo ?