Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Nokian WetProof Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Nokian WetProof 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

2. Nokian WetProof 14x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Nokian WetProof 17.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Nokian WetProof 5.64

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

4. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Nokian WetProof Sehr empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

1. Nokian WetProof Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

Nokian
WetProof

85%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Nokian WetProof 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Nokian WetProof 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Nokian
WetProof

76%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

70%

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 76%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. Nokian WetProof 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Nokian WetProof 71%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 67%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Nokian WetProof 63%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Nokian
WetProof

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

2. Nokian WetProof 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Nokian WetProof ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

74%

Nokian
WetProof

65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Nokian WetProof 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Nokian WetProof 56%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 83%

3. Nokian WetProof 78%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

3. Nokian WetProof C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?