Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 91

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 2x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 6.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 10.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 8

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 2026

3. Falken e.Ziex 2025

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

1. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Empfohlen

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

4. Falken e.Ziex Gut

Continental
PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

72%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 74%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 84%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 42%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 86%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

91%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 69%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 71%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 42%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 96%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

84%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 84%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 B

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?