Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 176

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 23x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.26

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Sehr gut

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 83%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

76%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 74%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 0%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 0%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Hankook
ION Evo

76%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Hankook ION Evo 69%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?