57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Apollo Alnac 4G gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Apollo Alnac 4GBudget
ApolloApollo

Alnac 4G

2.3
R14 – R17
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Apollo
Alnac 4G
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
8
18
3
28
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
18.9
6.1
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
77
47
36
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Apollo Alnac 4G
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Apollo Alnac 4G
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Apollo Alnac 4G
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Apollo Alnac 4G
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Apollo Alnac 4G
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Apollo Alnac 4G
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Apollo Alnac 4G
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Apollo Alnac 4G
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Apollo Alnac 4G
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Apollo Alnac 4G
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Apollo Alnac 4G
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Apollo Alnac 4G
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyApollo Alnac 4G vs Tristar Ecopower 4Apollo Alnac 4G vs Lassa RevolaApollo Alnac 4G vs Viking Protech NewGenApollo Alnac 4G vs Avon ZV7

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen