Segment 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Premium 2. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium 4. Hankook ION Evo Premium
Anzahl der verfügbaren Größen 1. Michelin Primacy 5 126 2. Hankook ION Evo 64 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 0
Anzahl der Tests 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x 2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 1x 3. Hankook ION Evo 1x 4. Michelin Primacy 5 1x
Beste Position im Test 1. Michelin Primacy 5 1. 2. Hankook ION Evo 1. 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2. 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5.
Schlechteste Position im Test 1. Michelin Primacy 5 1. 2. Hankook ION Evo 1. 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5. 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.
Durchschnittliche Position in Tests 1. Michelin Primacy 5 1 2. Hankook ION Evo 1 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5
Jahr der letzten Prüfung 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025 2. Hankook ION Evo 2025 3. Michelin Primacy 5 2025 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 2024
Beste Bewertung im Test 1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut 3. Michelin Primacy 5 Testsieger 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Gut
Schlechteste Bewertung im Test 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen 2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Gut 3. Hankook ION Evo ? 4. Michelin Primacy 5 ?
Nass(Gesamtbewertung) Hankook ION Evo 88% Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 79% Michelin Primacy 5 58%
Nassbremsen 1. Hankook ION Evo 97% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78% 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70% 4. Michelin Primacy 5 65%
Aquaplaning - quer 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 100% 2. Hankook ION Evo 87% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69% 4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%
Handling - nass 1. Hankook ION Evo 92% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74% 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70% 4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%
Aquaplaning - längs 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 90% 2. Hankook ION Evo 77% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66% 4. Michelin Primacy 5 51%
Nassbremsung nach EU-Label 1. Hankook ION Evo A 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A 3. Michelin Primacy 5 A 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ?
Trocken(Gesamtbewertung) Hankook ION Evo 92% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77% Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 77% Michelin Primacy 5 73%
Handling - trocken 1. Hankook ION Evo 92% 2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77% 4. Michelin Primacy 5 69%
Trockenbremsen 1. Hankook ION Evo 91% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77% 3. Michelin Primacy 5 76% 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70%
Komfort(Gesamtbewertung) Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 98% Hankook ION Evo 72% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 63% Michelin Primacy 5 1%
Komfort 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 95% 2. Hankook ION Evo 78% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59% 4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%
Außengeräusch 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 100% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67% 3. Hankook ION Evo 66% 4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%
Außenlärm nach EU-Label 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ? 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ? 3. Hankook ION Evo ? 4. Michelin Primacy 5 ?
Kosten(Gesamtbewertung) Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72% Hankook ION Evo 69% Michelin Primacy 5 63%
Rollwiderstand 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72% 3. Hankook ION Evo 69% 4. Michelin Primacy 5 63%
Kraftstoffverbrauch nach eu-label 1. Hankook ION Evo A 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B 3. Michelin Primacy 5 B 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ?