Segment 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Premium 2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium 4. Hankook ION Evo Premium
Anzahl der verfügbaren Größen 1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123 3. Hankook ION Evo 64 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 0
Anzahl der Tests 1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 1x 4. Hankook ION Evo 1x
Beste Position im Test 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1. 2. Hankook ION Evo 1. 3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3. 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5.
Schlechteste Position im Test 1. Hankook ION Evo 1. 2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5. 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8. 4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.
Durchschnittliche Position in Tests 1. Hankook ION Evo 1 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5 4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5
Jahr der letzten Prüfung 1. Hankook ION Evo 2025 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 2024 4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023
Beste Bewertung im Test 1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Beispielhaft 2. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Gut
Schlechteste Bewertung im Test 1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Gut 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Gut 4. Hankook ION Evo ?
Nass(Gesamtbewertung) Hankook ION Evo 88% Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81% Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% Michelin Primacy 4+ 75%
Nassbremsen 1. Hankook ION Evo 97% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79% 3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76% 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70%
Aquaplaning - quer 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 100% 2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89% 3. Hankook ION Evo 87% 4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%
Handling - nass 1. Hankook ION Evo 92% 2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78% 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70%
Aquaplaning - längs 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 90% 2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79% 4. Hankook ION Evo 77%
Nassbremsung nach EU-Label 1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ A 3. Hankook ION Evo A 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ?
Trocken(Gesamtbewertung) Hankook ION Evo 92% Michelin Primacy 4+ 82% Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 80% Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 77%
Trockenbremsen 1. Hankook ION Evo 91% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87% 3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83% 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70%
Handling - trocken 1. Hankook ION Evo 92% 2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 93% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83% 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80%
Komfort(Gesamtbewertung) Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 98% Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83% Michelin Primacy 4+ 80% Hankook ION Evo 72%
Komfort 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 95% 2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 91% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83% 4. Hankook ION Evo 78%
Außengeräusch 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 100% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77% 3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75% 4. Hankook ION Evo 66%
Außenlärm nach EU-Label 1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB 2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ? 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ ? 4. Hankook ION Evo ?
Kosten(Gesamtbewertung) Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86% Michelin Primacy 4+ 82% Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% Hankook ION Evo 69%
Rollwiderstand 1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82% 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% 4. Hankook ION Evo 69%
Kraftstoffverbrauch nach eu-label 1. Hankook ION Evo A 2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ C 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ?