Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Hankook ION Evo Premium

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 42

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 1x

5. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2.

4. Falken e.Ziex 2.

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 5.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 2019

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Zufriedenstellend

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo

71%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

5. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 67%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

5. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 67%

5. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 67%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo B

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo

74%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 70 dB

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

Hankook
ION Evo

91.5%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo

86%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

66%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 80%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 67%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

5. Falken e.Ziex 0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo

93%

Hankook
ION Evo

82%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Hankook ION Evo 82%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo C

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?