Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 188

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 14x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 1.

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

4. Falken e.Ziex 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 7.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 3.57

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Beispielhaft

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

4. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

1. Falken e.Ziex Gut

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 81%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 75%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 68%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 83%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 67%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 B

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

71%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 56%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 82%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

3. Falken e.Ziex 87%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 0%

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6

80%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 66%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 60%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

95%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

71%

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6

59%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 85%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 73%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 28%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 63%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?