Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Cooper Zeon CS8 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Firestone Roadhawk Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. Cooper Zeon CS8 145

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Cooper Zeon CS8 14x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 9.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 33.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Cooper Zeon CS8 2023

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

1. Firestone Roadhawk Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Firestone Roadhawk Bedingt empfohlen

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 Ausreichend

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Cooper
Zeon CS8

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

1. Cooper Zeon CS8 79%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Cooper Zeon CS8 84%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Cooper Zeon CS8 86%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Cooper Zeon CS8 75%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Cooper Zeon CS8 76%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk A

3. Cooper Zeon CS8 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Cooper
Zeon CS8

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 59%

1. Cooper Zeon CS8 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 60%

Cooper
Zeon CS8

80%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

1. Cooper Zeon CS8 80%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 0%

1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Firestone Roadhawk ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Cooper
Zeon CS8

52%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Cooper Zeon CS8 49%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

3. Cooper Zeon CS8 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Falken e.Ziex 60%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

3. Cooper Zeon CS8 43%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Firestone Roadhawk C

3. Cooper Zeon CS8 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?