Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

Continental
PremiumContact 7

90%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

85%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75.8%

Falken
e.Ziex

69%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 96%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 83%

3. Falken e.Ziex 59%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 99%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 62%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 80%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

94%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

74.8%

Falken
e.Ziex

70%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 91%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 67%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75.5%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

68%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 79%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 70%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 71%

2. Falken e.Ziex 66%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

91.3%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

65%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

58%

1. Falken e.Ziex 96%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 61%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?