57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Petlas Imperium PT515Budget
PetlasPetlas

Imperium PT515

3.7
R15 – R16
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Petlas
Imperium PT515
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
4
4
18
3
28
Optimale Position
#12
#13
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
24.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
11
111
40
47
36
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Petlas Imperium PT515
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Petlas Imperium PT515 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMPetlas Imperium PT515 vs Semperit Speed-Life 3Petlas Imperium PT515 vs Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePetlas Imperium PT515 vs Sava Intensa HP2

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen