Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

5. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken e.Ziex 2.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

5. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

4. Falken e.Ziex 77%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Michelin
Primacy 4+

81%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87.2%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

50%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

91%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?