Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Beispielhaft

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

73%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87.2%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%