Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.33

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2026

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 76%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

73%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 89%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

1. Firestone Multihawk 2 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%