Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Firestone Destination HP Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Destination HP 35

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Falken e.Ziex 3x

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Firestone Destination HP 1x

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Firestone Destination HP 3.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Firestone Destination HP 3.

3. Falken e.Ziex 5.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. Firestone Destination HP 3

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

4. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Firestone Destination HP 2017

1. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

4. Firestone Destination HP Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Firestone Destination HP Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Firestone
Destination HP

73%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

46%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. Firestone Destination HP 64%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 1%

1. Firestone Destination HP 78%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. Firestone Destination HP 61%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

1. Firestone Destination HP 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Firestone Destination HP 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. Firestone Destination HP B

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

87.5%

Firestone
Destination HP

71%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Firestone Destination HP 60%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Firestone Destination HP E

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Firestone
Destination HP

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

42%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Firestone Destination HP 62%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Firestone Destination HP ?

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Firestone
Destination HP

95%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

75.3%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%