Vergleich: Falken EuroWinter HS02 gegen BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 176

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 98

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 23x

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 4x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 7.

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 22.

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.26

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 12.25

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 2025

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Sehr gut

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Sehr gut

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Zufriedenstellend

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Empfohlen

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Gut

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Zufriedenstellend

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

82.6%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02

60%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 B

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

90.6%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02

43.3%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

78.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02

67.8%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

83.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02

76.3%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Falken EuroWinter HS02 ?

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

79.5%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Falken
EuroWinter HS02

66.5%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 D

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E